Travis Bemann has added a new log for zeptoforth.SB5K on If You Aren’t Making Your Own Relays….Andrew on Arduino-Powered Trap Hopes To Catch Mice.Misterlaneous on Bare PCB Makes A Decent Homemade Smart Watch.Alphatek on Bare PCB Makes A Decent Homemade Smart Watch.HaHa on Arduino-Powered Trap Hopes To Catch Mice.S O on High Quality 3D Scene Generation From 2D Source, In Realtime.S O on On Vim, Modal Interfaces And The Way We Interact With Computers.Happy Dad on On Vim, Modal Interfaces And The Way We Interact With Computers.Dude on Here’s Why GPUs Are Deep Learning’s Best Friend.Logic Analyzers: Tapping Into Raspberry Pi Secrets 35 Comments Back in the day when Photoshop was being made, they went the other way around and asked professionals “What do you want to do with this?”, and they would explain what they need, and that’s why even after so many years Photoshop is the industry standard and everybody tries to copy Photoshop. Copying the functions but not the functionality is cargo cult usability – the people who made the copy didn’t understand what they were doing for the most part, or didn’t think it was important enough to include. In other words, like GIMP, it copies the manner but not the meaning. In photopea, there’s only a color picker and you’re supposed to know which RGB value in this program behaves like an 85 filter. So, there’s a list of often used filters, and then a color picker for custom options. These are specific values that are used to achieve certain effects like pulling down from 5500K outdoors color temperature to 3400 K indoors color temperature. It’s supposed to emulate gels that you put on the projector to achieve different color casts, and those have a “Wratten number” like “85” for amber. Sure, it looks and behaves in a familiar manner, but then…įor example, take the “Photo filters…” tool. What they don’t know is there is a silent ‘ but there has to be a better way then THAT’ attached to the phrase. I routinely say ‘Anything is possible’, some of my coworkers really like that. Error messages are less than useless, point you in wrong direction.ĭoes something ‘work’ if you have to do something 3 times after checking if it worked this time? Not documented behavior, tutorials just do it right and never mention the trap. You need to close the project without saving, close freeCAD then restart and try again. If one of your section sketches isn’t closed though, it will corrupt your project.

It is good enough to store hackaday comments… mySQL can work, as long as you are willing to use a terrible completely non-standard SQL dialect (you’ll be stuck with it), are also willing to routinely take down the database for re-indexing, don’t need transactions and don’t mind a few rows going missing once in a while. You’ve never used a product that could be made to work by nursing it but would fail as soon as you turned your back?Į.g. Posted in cnc hacks Tagged cad, freecad, wireframe Post navigation If you need a quick basic tutorial, try the one from. You’ll probably pick up at least one tip from this video. Watching videos like this reminds us that we use a small fraction of what FreeCAD can do. There are still some details to add, though, and you’ll see how each part of the roof takes shape. You can extrude that into a solid object. The curves workbench can create a Gordon surface over that skeleton. Then the draft workbench allowed a rotation to convert the curve into a nice skeleton of the curved roof. He starts with a sketch of a curve, constrained to be symmetrical. The curve bench didn’t sound familiar to us, and that’s because it is an add-on workbench. Naturally, there are several ways it could be one, but used the curves workbench in FreeCAD to produce a wireframe of the shape, and you can see how that works in the video below.

We have to admit that when we saw it, we knew it would be hard to model well. Got a question from someone trying to model a phone box with a complex curved roof.

Realthunder freecad